Extended Profile Deviation
NEW SSR- JAN 2023
Criterion 1 – Curricular Aspects (100)
| Metric No. | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|
| Key Indicator – 1.1 | Curricular Planning and Implementation (20) | |
| 1.1.1 | The Institution ensures effective curriculum planning and delivery through a well-planned and documented process including Academic calendar and conduct of continuous internal Assessment | View Link |
| Key Indicator – 1.2 | Academic Flexibility (30) | |
| 1.2.1 | Number of Add on /Certificate/Value added programs offered during the last five years | View Link |
| 1.2.2 | Percentage of students enrolled in Certificate/ Add-on/Value added programs as against the total number of students during the last five years | View Link |
| Key Indicator- 1.3 | Curriculum Enrichment (30) | |
| 1.3.1 | Institution integrates crosscutting issues relevant to Professional Ethics, Gender, Human Values, Environment and Sustainability into the Curriculum | View Link |
| 1.3.2 | Percentage of students undertaking project work/field work/ internships (Data for the latest completed academic year) | View Link |
| Key Indicator- 1.4 | Feedback System (20) | |
| 1.4.1 |
Institution obtains feedback on the academic
performance and ambience of the institution from
various stakeholders, such as Students, Teachers,
Employers, Alumni etc. and action taken report on
the feedback is made available on institutional
website (Yes or No) Options: A. All 4 of the above B. Any 3 of the above C. Any 2 of the above D. Any 1 of the above E. None of the above |
View Link |
Key Indicator - 1.2 Academic Flexibility
Key Indicator - 1.3 Curriculum Enrichment
| Metric No. | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 1.3.1 | Institution integrates crosscutting issues relevant to Professional Ethics ,Gender, Human Values ,Environment and Sustainability into the Curriculum | View Link |
| 1.3.1 (i) | List and Description of courses which address the Professional Ethics, Gender, Human Values, Environment and Sustainability into the Curriculum | View Link |
| 1.3.1 (ii) | Institution integrates crosscutting issues relevant to Professional Ethics, Gender, Human Values, Environment and Sustainability | View Link |
| 1.3.2 (i) | Courses that include experiential learning through project work/field work/internship | View Link |
| 1.3.2 (ii) | Experiential learning through project work/field work | View Link |
NEW SSR- JAN 2023
Criterion II - Teaching- Learning and Evaluation (350)
| Metric No. | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|
| Key Indicator – 2.1 | Student Enrolment and Profile (40) | |
| 2.1.1 | Enrolment percentage | View Link |
| 2.1.2 | Percentage of seats filled against seats reserved for various categories (SC, ST, OBC, Divyangjan, etc.) as per applicable reservation policy during the last five years | View Link |
| Key Indicator – 2.2 | Student Teacher Ratio (40) | |
| 2.2.1 | Student – Full time Teacher Ratio (Data for the latest completed academic year) | View Link |
| Key Indicator – 2.3 | Teaching- Learning Process (40) | |
| 2.3.1 | Student centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative learning and problem solving methodologies are used for enhancing learning experiences using ICT tools | View Link |
| Key Indicator – 2.4 | Teacher Profile and Quality (40) | |
| 2.4.1 | Percentage of full-time teachers against sanctioned posts during the last five years | View Link |
| 2.4.2 | Percentage of full time teachers with NET/SET/SLET/ Ph. D. / D.M. / M.Ch. / D.N.B Superspeciality / D.Sc. / D.Litt. during the last five years | View Link |
| Key Indicator – 2.5 | Evaluation Process and Reforms (40) | |
| 2.5.1 | Mechanism of internal/ external assessment is transparent and the grievance redressal system is time- bound and efficient | View Link |
| Key Indicator – 2.6 | Student Performance and Learning Outcome (90) | |
| 2.6.1 | Programme Outcomes (POs) and Course Outcomes (COs) for all Programmes offered by the institution are stated and displayed on website and attainment of POs and COs are evaluated | View Link |
| 2.6.2 | Pass percentage of Students during last five years | View Link |
| 2.6.3 | 263-1-PDF | View Link |
| Key Indicator – 2.7 | Student Satisfaction Survey (60) | |
| 2.7.1 | Online student satisfaction survey regarding to teaching learning process. | View Link |
Key Indicator- 2.2 Catering to Student Diversity
| Metric No. | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2.2.1 | The institution assesses the learning levels of the students and organises special Programmes for advanced learners and slow learners | View Link |
Key Indicator- 2.3 Teaching- Learning Process
| Metric No. | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2.3.1 | Student centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative learning and problem solving methodologies are used for enhancing learning experiences | View Link |
| 2.3.2 | Teachers use ICT enabled tools for effective teaching-learning process. | View Link |
| 2.3.3 | Ratio of mentor to students for academic and other related issues (Data for the latest completed academic year ) Formula: Mentor : Mentee | |
| 2.3.3_i | List of full-time faculty and number of students enrolled (last 5 years) | View Link |
| 2.3.3_ii | Proofs of Mentoring Records (last completed academic year) | View Link |
| 2.3.3_iii | Circulars Pertaining to Assigning Mentors to Mentees (last five years) | View Link |
Key Indicator- 2.4 Teacher Profile and Quality
| Metric No. | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2.4.1 | Average percentage of full time teachers against sanctioned posts during the last five years | |
| 2.4.1_i | Supporting Documents | View Link |
| 2.4.1_ii | Additional Documents | View Link |
| 2.4.2 | Average percentage of full time teachers with Ph. D. / D.M. / M.Ch. / D.N.B Superspeciality / D.Sc. / D.Litt. during the last five years (consider only highest degree for count) | View Link |
| 2.4.3 | Average teaching experience of full time teachers in the same institution (Data for the latest completed academic year in number of years) | View Link |
Key Indicator- 2.5 Evaluation Process and Reforms
Key Indicator- 2.6 Student Performance and Learning Outcomesy
| Metric No. | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2.6.1 | Programme and course outcomes for all Programmes offered by the institution are stated and displayed on website and communicated to teachers and students. | |
| 2.6.1_i | Course Outcomes | View Link |
| 2.6.1_ii | Programme Outcomes 2020-2021 and Communication Modes | View Link |
| 2.6.2 | Attainment of programme outcomes and course outcomes are evaluated by the institution. | View Link |
Key Indicator- 2.7 Student Satisfaction Survey
| Metric No. | |
|---|---|
| 2.7.1 | Online student satisfaction survey regarding to teaching learning process. |
Criterion III - Research, Innovations and Extension
| Metric No. | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|
| Key Indicator – 3.1 | Resource Mobilization for Research (10) | |
| 3.1.1 | Grants received from Government and non-governmental agencies for research projects / endowments in the institution during the last five years (INR in Lakhs) | View Link |
| Key Indicator – 3.2 | Innovation Ecosystem (15) | |
| 3.2.1 | Institution has created an ecosystem for innovations and has initiatives for creation and transfer of knowledge (patents filed, published, incubation center facilities in the HEI to be considered) | 10 |
| 3.2.1(a) | Incubation Centres-Snaps-Description | View Link |
| 3.2.1(b) | Patents | View Link |
| 3.2.2 | Number of workshops/seminars/conferences including on Research Methodology, Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) and entrepreneurship conducted during the last five years | View Link |
| Key Indicator – 3.3 | Research Publication and Awards (25) | |
| 3.3.1 | Number of research papers published per teacher in the Journals notified on UGC care list during the last five years | View Link |
| 3.3.2 | Number of books and chapters in edited volumes/books published and papers published in national/ international conference proceedings per teacher during last five years | View Link |
| Key Indicator – 3.4 | Extension Activities (40) | |
| 3.4.1 | Extension activities are carried out in the neighborhood community, sensitizing students to social issues, for their holistic development, and impact thereof during the last five years. | View Link |
| 3.4.2 | Awards and recognitions received for extension activities from government / government recognised bodies | View Link |
| 3.4.3 | Number of extension and outreach programs conducted by the institution through NSS/NCC/Red cross/YRC etc., (including the programmes such as Swachh Bharat, AIDS awareness, Gender issues etc. and/or those organised in collaboration with industry, community and NGOs) during the last five years | View Link |
| Key Indicator – 3.5 | Collaboration (20) | |
| 3.5.1 | The number of MoUs, collaborations/linkages for Faculty exchange, Student exchange, Internship, Field trip, On-the- job training, research and other academic activities during the last five years | View Link |
Key Indicator - 3.2 Innovation Ecosystem
| Metric No. | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 3.2.1 | Institution has created an ecosystem for innovations and has initiatives for creation and transfer of knowledge | View Link |
Key Indicator - 3.3 Research Publication and Awards
| Metric No. | Description | Link |
|---|
Key Indicators - 3.4 Extension Activities
| Metric No. | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 3.4.1 | Extension activities are carried out in the neighborhood community, sensitizing students to social issues, for their holistic development, and impact thereof during the last five years. | View Link |
Key Indicator - 3.5 Collaboration
| Metric No. | Description | Link |
|---|
Criterion IV - Infrastructure and Learning Resources
| Metric No. | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|
| Key Indicator – 4.1 | Physical Facilities (30) | |
| 4.1.1 | Availability of adequate infrastructure and physical facilities viz., classrooms, laboratories, ICT facilities, cultural activities, gymnasium, yoga centre etc. in the institution | View Link |
| 4.1.2 | Percentage of expenditure, excluding salary for infrastructure augmentation during last five years (INR in Lakhs) | View Link |
| 4.1.4 | Audit Statement | View Link |
| Key Indicator – 4.2 | Library as a learning Resource (20) | |
| 4.2.1 | Library is automated using Integrated Library Management System (ILMS), subscription to e-resources, amount spent on purchase of books, journals and per day usage of library | View Link |
| Key Indicator – 4.3 | IT Infrastructure (30) | |
| 4.3.1 | Institution frequently updates its IT facilities and provides sufficient bandwidth for internet connection | View Link |
| 4.3.2 | Student – Computer ratio (Data for the latest completed academic year) | View Link |
| Key Indicator – 4.4 | Maintenance of Campus Infrastructure (20) | |
| 4.4.1 | Percentage of expenditure incurred on maintenance of infrastructure (physical and academic support facilities) excluding salary component during the last five years (INR in Lakhs) | View Link |
Key Indicator - 4.2 Library as a learning Resource
| Metric No. | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 4.2.1 | Library is automated using Integrated Library Management System (ILMS) | View Link |
| 4.2.2 |
The institution has subscription for the following
e-resources
|
View Link |
| 4.2.3(i) | Expenditure of purchase of books/e-books and subscription to journals/e- journals | View Link |
Key Indicator - 4.3 IT Infrastructure
| Metric No. | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 4.3.1 | Institution frequently updates its IT facilities including Wi-Fi | View Link |
Key Indicator - 4.4 Maintenance of Campus Infrastructure
| Metric No. | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 4.4.2 | There are established systems and procedures for maintaining and utilizing physical, academic and support facilities - laboratory, library, sports complex, computers, classrooms etc. | View Link |
Criterion V - Student Support and Progression
| Metric No. | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|
| Key Indicator – 5.1 | Student Support (50) | |
| 5.1.1 | Percentage of students benefited by scholarships and freeships provided by the Government and Non-Government agencies during last five years | View Link |
| 5.1.2 |
Capacity building and skills enhancement
initiatives taken by the institution include the
following
1. Soft skills 2. Language and communication skills 3. Life skills (Yoga, physical fitness, health and hygiene) 4. ICT/computing skills Options: A. All of the above B. 3 of the above C. 2 of the above D. 1 of the above E. None of the above |
View Link |
| 5.1.3 | Percentage of students benefitted by guidance for competitive examinations and career counseling offered by the Institution during the last five years | View Link |
| 5.1.4 |
The Institution has a transparent mechanism for
timely redressal of student grievances including
sexual harassment and ragging cases 1. Implementation of guidelines of statutory/regulatory bodies 2. Organisation wide awareness and undertakings on policies with zero tolerance 3. Mechanisms for submission of online/offline students’ grievances 4. Timely redressal of the grievances through appropriate committees Options: A. All of the above B. Any 3 of the above C. Any 2 of the above D. Any 1 of the above E. None of the above |
View Link |
| Key Indicator – 5.2 | Student Progression (30) | |
| 5.2.1 | Percentage of placement of outgoing students and students progressing to higher education during the last five years | View Link |
| 5.2.2 | Percentage of students qualifying in state/national/ international level examinations during the last five years (eg: JAM/CLAT/GATE/ GMAT/ CAT/ GRE/ TOEFL/ Civil Services/State government examinations) | View Link |
| Key Indicator – 5.3 | Student Participation and Activities (50) | |
| 5.3.1 | Number of awards/medals for outstanding performance in sports/ cultural activities at University / state/ national / international level (award for a team event should be counted as one) during the last five years | View Link |
| 5.3.2 | Average number of sports and cultural programs in which students of the Institution participated during last five years (organised by the institution/other institutions) | View Link |
| Key Indicator – 5.4 | Alumni Engagement (10) | |
| 5.4.1 | There is a registered Alumni Association that contributes significantly to the development of the institution through financial and/or other support services | View Link |
| 5.4.2 | Alumni contribution during the last five years (INR in lakhs) | View Link |
Key Indicator- 5.2 Student Progression
| Metric No. | Description | Link |
|---|
Key Indicator- 5.3 Student Participation and Activities
| Metric No. | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 5.3.2 | Institution facilitates students’ representation and engagement in various administrative, co-curricular and extracurricular activities following duly established processes and norms (student council, students representation on various bodies) | View Link |
| 5.3.3 | Average number of sports and cultural events/competitions in which students of the Institution participated during last five years (organised by the institution/other institutions) | View Link |
| 5.3.3 (i) | Participation in Sports and Cultural Activities/Events/Competitions | View Link |
Key Indicator- 5.4 Alumni Engagement (10)
| Metric No. | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 5.4.1 | There is a registered Alumni Association that contributes significantly to the development of the institution through financial and/or other support services | View Link |
Criterion VI - Governance, Leadership and Management
| Metric No. | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|
| Key Indicator – 6.1 | Institutional Vision and Leadership (10) | |
| 6.1.1 | The governance and leadership is in accordance with vision and mission of the institution and it is visible in various institutional practices such as decentralization and participation in the institutional governance | View Link |
| Key Indicator – 6.2 | Strategy Development and Deployment (10) | |
| 6.2.1 | The functioning of the institutional bodies is effective and efficient as visible from policies, administrative setup, appointment and service rules, procedures, deployment of institutional Strategic/ perspective/development plan etc | View Link |
| 6.2.2 |
Implementation of e-governance in areas of
operation
1. Administration 2. Finance and Accounts- 3. Student Admission and Support 4. Examination Options: A. All of the above B. Any 3 of the above C. Any 2 of the above D. Any 1 of the above E. None of the above |
View Link |
| Key Indicator – 6.3 | Faculty Empowerment Strategies (35) | |
| 6.3.1 | The institution has effective welfare measures and Performance Appraisal System for teaching and non-teaching staff | View Link |
| 6.3.2 | Percentage of teachers provided with financial support to attend conferences/workshops and towards membership fee of professional bodies during the last five years | View Link |
| 6.3.3 | Percentage of teaching and non-teaching staff participating in Faculty development Programmes (FDP), professional development /administrative training programs during the last five years | View Link |
| Key Indicator – 6.4 | Financial Management and Resource Mobilization (15) | |
| 6.4.1 | Institution has strategies for mobilization and optimal utilization of resources and funds from various sources (government/ non-government organizations) and it conducts financial audits regularly (internal and external) | View Link |
| Key Indicator – 6.5 | Internal Quality Assurance System (30) | |
| 6.5.1 | Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) has contributed significantly for institutionalizing the quality assurance strategies and processes. It reviews teaching learning process, structures & methodologies of operations and learning outcomes at periodic intervals and records the incremental improvement in various activities | View Link |
| 6.5.2 |
Quality assurance initiatives of the institution
include:
1. Regular meeting of Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC); Feedback collected, analysed and used for improvements 2. Collaborative quality initiatives with other institution(s)/ membership of international networks 3. Participation in NIRF 4. any other quality audit/accreditation recognized by state, national or international agencies such as NAAC, NBA, ISO Certification etc Options: A. All of the above B. Any 3 of the above C. Any 2 of the above D. Any 1 of the above E. None of the above |
15 |
| 6.5.2(a) | GPS Snaps of IQAC meets and its Reports | View Link |
| 6.5.2(b) | MOUs and Reports of Collabarative Activities with Snaps | View Link |
Key Indicator- 6.2 Strategy Development and Deployment
| Metric No. | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 6.2.1 | The institutional Strategic/ perspective plan is effectively deployed | |
| 6.2.1 (i) | Strategic plan and Deployment of the Strategic plan | View Link |
| 6.2.1 (ii) | Strategic plan and Deployment of the Strategic plan (Weblink) | View Link |
| 6.2.2 | The functioning of the institutional bodies is effective and efficient as visible from policies, administrative setup, appointment and service rules, procedures, etc. | View Link |
| 6.2.3 |
Implementation of e-governance in areas of operation
|
|
| 6.2.3 (i) | Screenshots of User Interface | View Link |
| 6.2.3 (ii) | ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) Document | View Link |
| 6.2.3 (iii) | E- Governance Reports | View Link |
Key Indicator- 6.3 Faculty Empowerment Strategies
| Metric No. | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 6.3.1 | The institution has effective welfare measures for teaching and non-teaching staff | View Link |
| 6.3.3 | Average number of professional development /administrative training programs organized by the institution for teaching and non teaching staff during the last five years | View Link |
| 6.3.4 |
Average percentage of teachers undergoing online/
face-to-face Faculty Development Programmes (FDP)
during the last five years (Professional Development Programmes, Orientation / Induction Programmes, Refresher Course, Short Term Course etc.) |
View Link |
| 6.3.4 (i) | IQAC Report SUMMARY | View Link |
| 6.3.5 | Institutions Performance Appraisal System for teaching and non-teaching staff | View Link |
Key Indicator- 6.4 Financial Management and Resource Mobilization
Key Indicator- 6.5 Internal Quality Assurance System
| Metric No. | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 6.5.1 | Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) has contributed significantly for institutionalizing the quality assurance strategies and processes | View Link |
| 6.5.2 | The institution reviews its teaching learning process, structures & methodologies of operations and learning outcomes at periodic intervals through IQAC set up as per norms and recorded the incremental improvement in various activities | View Link |
| 6.5.3 (ii) | Quality Assurance Initiatives of the Institution | View Link |
Criterion VII - Institutional Values and Best Practices
| Metric No. | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|
| Key Indicator – 7.1 | Institutional Values and Social Responsibilities (50) | |
| 7.1.1 | Measures initiated by the Institution for the promotion of gender equity and Institutional initiatives to celebrate / organize national and international commemorative days, events and festivals during the last five years (Within 500 words) | View Link |
| 7.1.2 |
The Institution has facilities and initiatives
for
1. Alternate sources of energy and energy conservation measures 2. Management of the various types of degradable and non- degradable waste 3. Water conservation 4. Green campus initiatives 5. Disabled-friendly, barrier free environment Options: A. 4 or All of the above B. 3 of the above C. 2 of the above D.1of the above E. None of the above |
View Link |
| 7.1.3 | Quality audits on environment and energy regularly undertaken by the Institution. | View Link |
| 7.1.4 | Describe the Institutional efforts/initiatives in providing an inclusive environment i.e., tolerance and harmony towards cultural, regional, linguistic, communal socioeconomic and Sensitization of students and employees to the constitutional obligations: values, rights, duties and responsibilities of citizens | View Link |
| Key Indicator – 7.2 | Best Practices (30) | |
| 7.2.1 | Describe two best practices successfully implemented by the Institution as per NAAC format provided in the Manual | View Link |
| Key Indicator – 7.3 | Institutional Distinctiveness (20) | |
| 7.3.1 | Portray the performance of the Institution in one area distinctive to its priority and thrust within 1000 words | View Link |
Key Indicator - 7.2 Best Practices
| Metric No. | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 7.2.1 | Describe two best practices successfully implemented by the Institution as per NAAC format provided in the Manual. | View Link |
Key Indicator - 7.3 Institutional Distinctiveness
| Metric No. | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 7.3.1 | Portray the performance of the Institution in one area distinctive to its priority and thrust within 1000 words | View Link |